Seatrade Maritime is part of the Informa Markets Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Live From Sea Asia 2017

The private independent shipowner wins the day at Sea Asia parliamentary debate

The private independent shipowner wins the day at Sea Asia parliamentary debate
The second day of Sea Asia 2017 saw an impassioned debate as to whether “the best days of the private independent shipowner are over”.

Transforming the conference hall intp a parliamentary debating chamber six speakers - three for the motion and three against – put their case to the delegates, or members of parliament, with BW Group and Singapore Maritime Foundation (SMF) chairman Andreas Sohmen-Pao presiding as Speaker of the House.

The debate played out with a level of passion rarely seen at shipping conferences with core themes of other people’s money, or OPM, and scale running through the session.

Opening the speaking for the motion Michael Parker, global head of shipping for Citigroup commented on what has been happening in recent years said: “The few have destroyed the many, and that’s why the private shipowner will struggle to survive.”

Kenneth Hvid, president and ceo of Teekay Corp, noted that the company had started out as a private one in the 1970’s but gone public in 1995. “Size and reputation matters,” he stated, saying that a reason to be a public company is that bankers say they are focused on serving larger, public companies.

Mikael Skov from private equity backed Hafnia tankers said if you went to a bank wanting to buy one or two ships, “it was not going happen” and owners needed scale and a plan.

It was Greek shipowner Flippos Lemos, president of NS Lemos & Co, speaking against the motion, who coined the OPM term, which was then picked up by other speakers. “Shipping is quite simply not an ideal fit for the broader equity capital market. Other people’s money serves to exacerbate short term investment in the industry,” he stated.

Also speaking against the motion was Randy Chen, vice chairman of Wan Hai Lines, a niche privately-owned container line. “Financial markets and shipping are rarely aligned,” he noted. This means that decisions to buy are taken at the wrong time in the cycle.

“The simple rationale is we take the capex decision out of institutional money’s hands. That’s how you can ‘zig’ when other people ‘zag’,” Chen stated.

Kenneth Koo, chairman and ceo of TCC Group, questioned if there ever had been any best days in shipping except perhaps in the 1950s in Asia, with any booms being very short.

As for the so-called supercycle in the noughties he asked: “Who were the victims? Not us (family owners). I would say the banks were the victims as they kept on lending.”

When it all came down to the vote at the end of the debate, the independent private shipowner turned out to be the clear winner in the eyes of the members of the audience with some 73% voting against the motion.

Hide comments


  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.