Sponsored By

Carbon emissions rocket as ships reroute from Red Sea to Cape

Shipping emissions have surged as a result of the Middle East conflict, propelling Xeneta’s Carbon Emissions Index (CEI) to a new record.

Paul Bartlett, Correspondent

April 24, 2024

2 Min Read
Smoke from ship funnel
Photo: Adobestock

The freight analytics consultancy has revealed that its CEI, which measures emissions per tonne of cargo shipped across 13 key trades, hit a high of 104.7 over the first quarter of the year. 

Worst hit were trade lanes from the Far East to the Mediterranean where the CEI shot up by 63% over the first three months, year-on-year. Xeneta’s analysis reveals that containers transported on this trade via the Cape of Good Hope were taken an extra 5,800 nautical miles on average.

Emily Stausbøll, a Xeneta analyst, noted that it’s not only an issue of distance. Ships are sailing at higher speeds to make up for lost time, she said. The speed-power curve means that fuel-burn and emissions rise exponentially as ships sail faster.  

Xeneta data demonstrates that cargo owners and shippers are adopting new options. Air cargo demand from Dubai Airport to European destinations, for example, rose by 190% in March, compared with the same month last year.

“Not only is air freight more expensive than ocean freight, it is also far less sustainable,” Stausbøll declared. “So, the shift to hybrid sea-air services via the Middle East will result in increased carbon emission per tonne of cargo transported.” 

There are also significant implications for ocean freight costs. Ships bound for ports in the European Economic Area will incur substantially higher EU Emissions Trading System costs for longer Cape voyages.  This will have a significant impact on supply chains and ultimately raw material costs, manufactured goods,  and retail inflation across the bloc. 

Related:Red Sea crisis has negative impact on gas ship CII ratings

Carriers will do that they can to pass these costs on to businesses shipping the goods, whether that is through increasing ocean freight shipping rates or additional surcharges, Stausbøll said.

“Either way, there is a financial price to pay ... ocean freight container shipping is only one sector, but this clearly demonstrates the massive impact war can have on carbon emissions and the climate.”  

Read more about:

carbon emissions

About the Author

Paul Bartlett

Correspondent

UK-based Paul Bartlett is a maritime journalist and consultant with over four decades of experience in international shipping, including ship leasing, project finance and financial due diligence procedures.

Paul is a former Editor of Seatrade magazine, which later became Seatrade Maritime Review, and has contributed to a range of Seatrade publications over the years including Seatrade’s Green Guide, a publication investigating early developments in maritime sustainability initiatives, and Middle East Workboats and Offshore Marine, focusing on the vibrant market for such vessels across that region.

In 2002, Paul set up PB Marine Consulting Ltd and has worked on a variety of consultancy projects during the last two decades. He has also contributed regular articles on the maritime sector for a range of shipping publications and online services in Europe, Asia, and the US.

Get the latest maritime news, analysis and more delivered to your inbox
Join 12,000+ members of the maritime community

You May Also Like