Sponsored By

Running ships more efficiently could dwarf other emissions reduction strategiesRunning ships more efficiently could dwarf other emissions reduction strategies

UCL and UMAS joint study shows huge potential of voyage optimisation to cut port wait times.

Paul Bartlett, Correspondent

December 5, 2024

2 Min Read
Image: Shutterstock/KrakenPlaces

Ditching the frequently used ‘sail fast, then wait’ mantra could slash emissions by huge margins, a joint study undertaken by University College London (UCL) and the consultancy, University Maritime Advisory Services (UMAS), has found.

The consultants analysed ship movements over a four-year period between 2018 and 2022 and found that potential emissions savings averaged 10% for container ships and bulk carriers; 16% for gas carriers and oil tankers; and close to 25% for chemical carriers. On average, ships spent 4-6% of their time – 15-22 days a year – waiting to berth.

Over the four-year period, waiting times rose to 5.5-6% for chemical tankers, gas ships, and bulk carriers. However, some of the increase in waiting times could have been attributable to Covid-induced port congestion, the analysts said. The times for container ships, 4.5%, and oil tankers, 5.5%, remained much the same.

Dr Tristan Smith, Professor of Energy and Transport at the UCL Energy Institute pointed to the significance of the IMO’s carbon intensity indicator (CII). “The IMO set ambitious greenhouse gas reduction targets in 2023. Meeting those targets means unlocking all efficiency opportunities – including voyage optimisation and operations around ports. This will only happen if CII remains a holistic metric covering all emissions, and incentivising shipowners, charterers and port stakeholders to break down long-running market barriers and failures,” he said.

Related:DP World and AM Green partner for sustainable fuels production

The consultants noted that the study demonstrates that the CII regulation should take into account every part of a ship’s voyage, not just the ‘sea-going passage’, as some have proposed. This would focus attention on the greenhouse gas intensity of ships along the entire maritime value chain, instead of merely isolating the parts over which shipowners or charterers exercise control.

UMAS Consultant and joint author of the study, Dr Haydn Francis, said: “Our analysis highlights that the no value-add emissions associated with port waiting times are a current and growing issue across the shipping sector. This is just one piece of the broader operational inefficiency puzzle that can be targeted to generate the short-term emissions reductions that will need to be achieved before 2030. By targeting these idle periods, the IMO can help unlock significant emissions reductions while also driving broader improvements in voyage optimisation and overall operational efficiency.”

Read more about:

GHG emissionsIMOCII

About the Author

Paul Bartlett

Correspondent

UK-based Paul Bartlett is a maritime journalist and consultant with over four decades of experience in international shipping, including ship leasing, project finance and financial due diligence procedures.

Paul is a former Editor of Seatrade magazine, which later became Seatrade Maritime Review, and has contributed to a range of Seatrade publications over the years including Seatrade’s Green Guide, a publication investigating early developments in maritime sustainability initiatives, and Middle East Workboats and Offshore Marine, focusing on the vibrant market for such vessels across that region.

In 2002, Paul set up PB Marine Consulting Ltd and has worked on a variety of consultancy projects during the last two decades. He has also contributed regular articles on the maritime sector for a range of shipping publications and online services in Europe, Asia, and the US.

Get the latest maritime news, analysis and more delivered to your inbox
Join 12,000+ members of the maritime community

You May Also Like