Sponsored By
Red Sea Crisis

The latest news and commentary on how the conflict in the Middle East is affecting the global maritime industry and shipping markets.

Fertiliser, grain, and clean product trades most exposed to Red Sea

As Houthi attacks on shipping extend beyond container ships, an analysis has shown the global bulk trades most reliant on the Suez Canal.

Gary Howard, Middle East correspondent

January 22, 2024

2 Min Read
Euronav Suezmax
Euronav

By looking at Suez Canal transit data, an analysis by Signal Ocean Data showed the exposure to Red Sea disruption of trades by cargo and by vessel type. The data showed that of the worldwide ocean trade in fertilisers, around 20% moves via the Suez Canal, followed by around 13% of the world grain and steel trades, and clean petroleum products at around 10%.

By vessel type, the analysis showed that of the tankers transiting Suez, 21.6% were Suezmax and 37.6% were Aframax, while for bulkers 37.0% were Supramax, 23.8% Panamax and 22.0% Handysize.

Signal noted that in the tanker trade, freight market movements in the Suexmax and Aframax segments seemed to reflect their greater exposure to the Red Sea, with Suezmax rates on the West Africa to UK/Continent and Aframax rates in the Mediterranean trades trending up in recent weeks.

“The decline in vessel numbers foreseen in the Red Sea for the tanker segment has already reached a record low since the beginning of last year, resulting in an increase in WS rates for the Suezmax Wafr-UKC of more than 50% to a level of around 140 WS and Aframax Cross Mediterranean rates of over 200 WS. In the VLCC segment, a spike has also been observed for the West Africa to China run, with rates at around 70 WS,” said Signal.

Related:Greek PM raises concerns about Red Sea crisis impact on trade

The firm’s data also showed that for the suezmax market, rerouting 40% of voyages by the Cape of Good Hope as opposed to Suez would lead to a 10% increase in tonne-miles, with a significant impact on freight costs.

For the Black Sea to India route, “the distance traveled would be three times as long, which means that the freight would need to be almost double in order to achieve the same earnings (TCE)... the freight increase could be in the order of  $4 million. This  corresponds to an overall increase in transportation costs of the order of $7 per barrel,” said Signal.
 

About the Author

Gary Howard

Middle East correspondent

Gary Howard is the Middle East Correspondent for Seatrade Maritime News and has written for Seatrade Cruise, Seatrade Maritime Review and was News Editor at Lloyd’s List. Gary’s maritime career started after catching the shipping bug during a research assignment for the offshore industry. Working out of Seatrade's head office in the UK, he also produces and contributes to conference programmes for Seatrade events including CMA Shipping, Seatrade Maritime Logistics Middle East and Marintec. 

Gary’s favourite topics within the maritime industry are decarbonisation and wind-assisted propulsion; he particularly enjoys reporting from industry events.

Conferences & Webinars

Gary Howard regularly moderates at international maritime events. Below you’ll find a list of selected past conferences and webinars.

Get the latest maritime news, analysis and more delivered to your inbox
Join 12,000+ members of the maritime community

You May Also Like